Home
Up
Village
Schools
Regional News
Special Reports
Opinion
Index
Links
Banter Board
Contact Us

Special Election Report

May 31, 2003

The free flow of information is a building block of democracy. Unlike the Leader, which operates more like the old Russian Pravda than an American Newspaper, FreeportNYNews is glad to present Sunday Coward's answers, as well as the publishers. It is only in this way that you can make an informed decision.
Publisher/editor. Stewart S Lilker
May 31, 2003

Freeport Paper Hits New Low
Tampers With Election News To Protect Income


by Stewart S Lilker

On May 29, 2003, the Official paper of the Village of Freeport and the Freeport

Stew Lilker's answers
Sunday Coward's answers

 School District, the Leader, hit a new low with its coverage of the upcoming Freeport School Board election and Budget Vote.


The Leader editor, Paul Laursen. FNYN file photo

In a Leader editorial, dated May 29, the Leader states, "... our readers have the important civic duty to find out about the candidates and issues and vote."

In the same Leader issue, Editor of the Leader, Paul Laursen, refused to run Board Candidate Stewart Lilker's answers to questions submitted to him by the paper.

In a phone conversation held on Tuesday, May 27, Laursen told Lilker that he wanted to edit out certain phrases from his answers. When Lilker asked him why, Laursen explained that the Leader's "libel" attorney told him he could. When Lilker asked to speak to this attorney, Laursen claimed, "He won't speak to you."

Laursen said the following phrases from Lilker's answers to the Leader questions were libelous:

In one of the most irresponsible actions ever, the Board, under the leadership of Sunday Coward, and Superintendent Eversley, reduced the teaching staff by 13 and increased the administrative staff by 11.

It appears no one in the district knows that the board hired a Harvard chum of the Superintendent for $2,000 dollars a day.

The school junkets, wherein the Board and the Superintendent squander the district's money, willy-nilly, is something a board member must guard the public against.

As the District has demonstrated in the past, it is impossible to trust their numbers, as many of them are clearly misrepresented.

Lilker told Laursen, "My answers were based upon my observations, my careful and detailed analysis of the budget, and my sources. The information contained in my answers is readily available in the budget and from the district."

When asked why he didn't check with the district, Laursen said that he left a message with the district, but the superintendents wouldn't return his calls.

Lilker told Laursen, "You sent me the questions and I answered them. I take full responsibility for them. They are my answers. If you edit them and take things out, without my permission, then they become your answers."

Lilker continued, "You are asking me to misrepresent myself. I will not do that. You are asking me to be dishonest and purport answers that are not mine, to be mine. I will not do that. You are asking me to be dishonest with the residents of Freeport. I will not do that. You are asking me to be a party, with you, in interfering with the constitutional process in Freeport and be a party to violating my own First Amendment rights. I will not do that. Finally, you are asking me to help you become the School District's water boy. I will not to that."

Laursen remained intractable, telling Lilker he had the right to edit his answers.

When it appeared that Laursen believed that he could edit whatever he wanted, without permission, explanation or reason, Lilker, exasperated, told him, "You have my permission to print my answers to your questions, as written. You do not have my permission to edit them in any way, without my prior approval. I remind you, they are my words and I take full responsibility for them. I am running for the Board of Education, the Leader is not. Should these conditions not be agreeable to you, I withdraw my answers.

Not only did Laursen not print Lilker's answers in the Leader's election issue, the paper removed his biography and photo.

In print, almost impossible to notice, at the bottom his opponent's answers to the Leader's questions, Laursen wrote, "School board candidate Stewart Lilker has withdrawn his answers to the questionnaire."

 

 

Home | Village | Schools | Special Reports | Opinion | Links | Index 
Contact Us | Vil Calendar |
School Calendar

Copyright 2003 FreeportNYNews